Sec. of Defense Gen. James Mattis Resigns in Protest

Sec. of Defense Gen. James Mattis Resigns in Protest

Likely the last voice of reason in Donald Trump’s cabinet, Secretary of Defense General James Mattis, resigns in protest. After months of disagreement on the proper path forward for both military strategy and foreign policy, Gen. Mattis elects to step aside. Mattis provided insight into his decision in a resignation letter offering a scathing rebuke of Trump’s foreign policy (read the full letter below).

In addition to Mattis serving as the 26th Secretary of Defense, Mattis’ service to the country includes service as Commander of the United States Central Command, Commander of the United States Joint Forces Command, Supreme Allied Commander, and awarded the Bronze Star Medal for valor. Mattis’ commitment to the preservation of the union is evident in his extensive service career and unmatched leadership in combat. In total, the four-star general proudly served the United States for nearly half a century. For this reason, Mattis’ resignation has heightened fears that public safety is even more at risk.

Credit: Jim Watson/Pool Photo via AP

Mattis highlighted his view of the importance of the role of NATO and the importance of preserving strategic alliances and partnerships in the letter.

The most glaring omission from Gen. Mattis’ resignation letter is an acknowledgment of the current occupant of the White House. Mattis only directly addresses Mr. Trump in the salutation. Typically, some version of the following phrase is incorporated in resignation letters of cabinet members: "It has been an honor to serve in your administration and under your leadership.”

Read General Mattis resignation letter below:

Dear Mr. President:

I have been privileged to serve as our country's 26th Secretary of Defense which has allowed me to serve alongside our men and women of the Department in defense of our citizens and our ideals.

I am proud of the progress that has been made over the past two years on some of the key goals articulated in our National Defense Strategy: putting the Department on a more sound budgetary footing, improving readiness and lethality in our forces, and reforming the Department's business practices for greater performance. Our troops continue to provide the capabilities needed to prevail in conflict and sustain strong U.S. global influence.

One core belief I have always held is that our strength as a nation is inextricably linked to the strength of our unique and comprehensive system of alliances and partnerships. While the US remains the indispensable nation in the free world, we cannot protect our interests or serve that role effectively without maintaining strong alliances and showing respect to those allies. Like you, I have said from the beginning that the armed forces of the United States should not be the policeman of the world. Instead, we must use all tools of American power to provide for the common defense, including providing effective leadership to our alliances. NATO's 29 democracies demonstrated that strength in their commitment to fighting alongside us following the 9-11 attack on America. The Defeat-ISIS coalition of 74 nations is further proof.

Similarly, I believe we must be resolute and unambiguous in our approach to those countries whose strategic interests are increasingly in tension with ours. It is clear that China and Russia, for example, want to shape a world consistent with their authoritarian model - gaining veto authority over other nations' economic, diplomatic, and security decisions - to promote their own interests at the expense of their neighbors, America and our allies. That is why we must use all the tools of American power to provide for the common defense.

My views on treating allies with respect and also being clear-eyed about both malign actors and strategic competitors are strongly held and informed by over four decades of immersion in these issues. We must do everything possible to advance an international order that is most conducive to our security, prosperity and values, and we are strengthened in this effort by the solidarity of our alliances.

Because you have the right to have a Secretary of Defense whose views are better aligned with yours on these and other subjects, I believe it is right for me to step down from my position. The end date for my tenure is February 28, 2019, a date that should allow sufficient time for a successor to be nominated and confirmed as well as to make sure the Department's interests are properly articulated and protected at upcoming events to include Congressional posture hearings and the NATO Defense Ministerial meeting in February. Further, that a full transition to a new Secretary of Defense occurs well in advance of the transition of Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in September in order to ensure stability Within the Department.

I pledge my full effort to a smooth transition that ensures the needs and interests of the 2.15 million Service Members and 732,079 DoD civilians receive undistracted attention of the Department at all times so that they can fulfill their critical, round-the-clock mission to protect the American people.

I very much appreciate this opportunity to serve the nation and our men and women in uniform.

Trump Surrenders to Putin and Russia at Helsinki Summit

Trump Surrenders to Putin and Russia at Helsinki Summit